State v. Ramsey
Idaho Supreme Court
1Concurrence
*5BISTLINE, Justice,
specially concurring.
I concur in the result reached by the majority opinion. Given the assignments of error which are raised on appeal and the actual procedures followed below, the result is sound. It should not be inferred, however, that the Court endorses the procedures which were followed in this case.
The Court is today called upon to resolve a conflict between defendant Ramsey’s Sixth Amendment right to present witnesses in his own behalf and the witness Gossi’s Fifth Amendment right not to be compelled to testify in any way which might tend to incriminate her. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. MayesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Roberto Gomez-Rojas, and Michael Rece SutherlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.