Legal Opinion

State v. Wamire

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1861PublishedCited by 27 opinions

APPEAL from the Jasper Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

The following points of criminal law are settled in this State :

1. If the Court, without the consent of the defendant, discharge the jury to whom his cause has been submitted, before verdict, no imperious necessity rendering such discharge necessary, it works an acquittal of the defendant; but such discharge with his consent does not work an acquittal, and the defendant should be held for another trial.

2. The Court is not bound thus to discharge the jury because the defendant consents to such discharge, and should • not thus discharge them on the consent of the defendant’s attorney alone.

3.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCorkle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Shular v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Falk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1899
  4. Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  5. Barton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API