Groneweg v. Kusworm
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Pottawattamie District Court. — IIon. 0. F. Loofbourow, Judge. This is an action at law, by wliicli plaintiffs, as appears from the averments of their petition, seek to recover of the defendant the sum of nine hundred dollars and interest for money advanced to defendant to be repaid by defendant. In other words, the cause of action set forth in the petition is to recover for money loaned. The answer was a general denial.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Pottawattamie District Court. — IIon. 0. F. Loofbourow, Judge. This is an action at law, by wliicli plaintiffs, as appears from the averments of their petition, seek to recover of the defendant the sum of nine hundred dollars and interest for money advanced to defendant to be repaid by defendant. In other words, the cause of action set forth in the petition is to recover for money loaned. The answer was a general denial. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRothjrook, J.
appeal- ' amendment of time. — I. The record in the c ase is attacked by a motion filed by appellees, based upon several grounds. The motion is supported by affidavits, and there are counter-affidavits ^37. appellant. Appellees seek to strike out part of the amended abstract filed by appellant. This part of the motion is not well taken. The amendment appears to be supported by the record, and it was filed in January, 1888, and before the argument of appellees was served on appellant, and in ample time for the appellees to present any argument they desired upon the record as amended. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Baudouine v. GrimesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
3Cited by1 opinion
- Perry Fry Co. v. GouldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932