Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Rich

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1864PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal in chancery from the Wayne Circuit. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell J.:

Complainant filed his bill to prevent' the sale of certain lands in the township of Romulus, for a ditch assessment. The principal objections are that [the venire was issued without proper authority; that it is defective in substance; that the verdict or finding of the jury is defective; and that the proceedings in letting the contracts are defective for want of legal notices.

The proceedings are alleged to have been had under the law of 1859. (Laws 1859, p. 499). That was the first law providing for a jury. The venire was issued by the chairman of the commissioners, February 25th,…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Alan v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Thomas v. GainMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Hoyt v. City of East SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Scofield v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Tod v. CrismanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API