Legal Opinion

In Re Uzialko

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 2006No. 16-17247PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEPHEN RASLAVICH, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. Introduction

Before the Court is the Debtors’ Motion to Compel IRS to Consider Offer in Compromise. In their Motion, the Debtors seek to compel the United States of America, on behalf of its agency, the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) to consider an offer-in-compromise submitted by the Debtors to the IRS during the pendency of this case. The IRS opposes the Motion. The Court held a hearing on this matter on March 3, 2006. For the reasons stated herein, the Court will deny the Debtors’ Motion.

II. Background

The Debtors in this case filed a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Noonan v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  3. 1900 M Restaurant Associates, Inc. v. United States (In Re 1900 M Restaurant Associates, Inc.)District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  4. Holmes v. United States (In Re Holmes)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2003
  5. Mills v. United States (In Re Mills)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. Blaylock (In Re Blaylock)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. In Re ShopeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API