Legal Opinion

Harrell v. Stumberg

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 18, 1952No. 40408PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

57 So.2d 692 (1952)

220 La. 811

HARRELL

v.

STUMBERG et al.

No. 40408.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 1952.

Durrett & Hardin, Kermit B. Guidroz and Harry J. Kron, Jr., all of Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellant.

Taylor, Porter, Brooks, Fuller & Phillips, Baton Rouge, for defendants-appellees.

PONDER, Justice.

The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment rejecting his demand for the specific performance of a contract to sell and purchase real estate.

Mrs. Nancy Coleman Stumberg, individually and as agent and attorney in fact for her co-owners, entered into an agreement, on September 24, 1946, with…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Di Cristina v. WeiserSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. Hoth v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  3. Lamar v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  4. Harrell v. StumbergSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Monk v. MonkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  2. Koerber v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  3. Everhardt v. SighinolfiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  4. Zemurray v. BoeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  5. Pittman v. PomeroyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API