State v. Murrell
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
Appellant Stanely Robert Murrell was convicted of first degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor and sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment. Appellant challenges the admission of the minor child’s videotaped testimony at trial in lieu of incourt testimony in appellant’s presence. We affirm.
FACTS
The victim in this case is the five year old stepson of appellant. Prior to trial, the State made a motion pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-1530(G) (Cum. Supp. 1988) 1 to videotape testimony of the victim outside the presence of appellant for subsequent presentation to the jury at…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Starnes v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- State v. BraySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.