Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Sakel
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided August 21, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
5. Samuel Di Falco, S.
In this probate proceeding persons claiming to be distributees of the testator, joined by the Public Administrator representing unknown heirs, move the court for an order requiring the proponent, who asserts that she is the widow of deceased, to comply with the terms of an agreement which the moving parties contend had settled the probate controversy. The proponent has countered with a motion to dismiss their petition as insufficient in law (Eulcs Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4).
It is apparently conceded that protracted negotiations to settle the matter were held between…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Kromer v. . HeimNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Teller v. Prospect Heights HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- People v. . St. Nicholas BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Sherry v. ProalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Home Insurance v. United Air Lines, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1973