McCarthy v. Schor & Rosner
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohn E. Cone, J.
Plaintiffs move, under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for an order granting summary judgment against defendant Schor & Rosner, a partnership (hereinafter referred to as defendant), and directing immediate assessment of damages by a jury. Defendant cross-moves for an order of preclusion for failure of plaintiffs to serve a bill of particulars pursuant to demand.
The action is one to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by the infant plaintiff Barbara McCarthy as a result of the negligence of defendant’s employee, Julius Stern, in the operation of a motor vehicle…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Suslensky v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1943
- Suslensky v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Glove City Amusement Co. v. Smalley Chain Theatres, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1938
- Sannasardo v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
3Cited by1 opinion
- Whitmier & Ferris Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961