Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Schor & Rosner

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJohn E. Cone, J.

Plaintiffs move, under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for an order granting summary judgment against defendant Schor & Rosner, a partnership (hereinafter referred to as defendant), and directing immediate assessment of damages by a jury. Defendant cross-moves for an order of preclusion for failure of plaintiffs to serve a bill of particulars pursuant to demand.

The action is one to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by the infant plaintiff Barbara McCarthy as a result of the negligence of defendant’s employee, Julius Stern, in the operation of a motor vehicle…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Suslensky v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1943
  2. Suslensky v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  3. Glove City Amusement Co. v. Smalley Chain Theatres, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Sannasardo v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Whitmier & Ferris Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API