Legal Opinion

Fillmore v. Johnson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 28, 1915PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

The circumstances which gave rise to this action and cross action were in substance as follows. For convenience we shall speak of Fillmore and Slade as the plaintiffs and Johnson as the defendant, although Johnson is the plaintiff in the cross action and Fillmore and Slade are in that action the defendants.

Before the contract hereinafter stated between the plaintiffs and the defendant the plaintiffs were the owners of a mill at which they manufactured tissue out of which "toilet” paper was made. The tissue (which was the product of their mill) was manufactured in large sheets called jumbo or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mayor of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Stone v. Wright Wire Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Koshland v. Columbia InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. United States v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937
  3. Boston Molasses Co. v. Molasses Distributors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Roblin Hope Industries, Inc. v. J. A. Sullivan Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  5. Walton Motor Co. v. American Hardware Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API