Carr v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
On appeal from tHe circuit court of Jackson county; Hon. John Watts, judge. The opinion of the court contains a statement of the facts of the case. Contended that the decision of the court below was erroneous, and cited and commented on'3 How. 227; 1 lb. 216; 6 lb. 542. If a new suit was instituted on the note, the defendant below could plead this judgment as a former recovery, and if this be true, the present judgment is valid in law. Cited in reply, 2 Greenl.
Read the full summary
On appeal from tHe circuit court of Jackson county; Hon. John Watts, judge. The opinion of the court contains a statement of the facts of the case. Contended that the decision of the court below was erroneous, and cited and commented on'3 How. 227; 1 lb. 216; 6 lb. 542. If a new suit was instituted on the note, the defendant below could plead this judgment as a former recovery, and if this be true, the present judgment is valid in law. Cited in reply, 2 Greenl. R. 435; 1 Humph. 80; 3 Marsh. 135; 3 Yerger, 426; 1 Littell, 28 ; 10 Peters, 449. If “ dollars” had been expressed in the verdict,…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fisher
This was a motion in the circuit court of Jackson county, to quash an' execution, and set aside a sale of land, by virtue of the same. Notice appears to have been given to the plaintiff in the execution as well as the purchaser of the land. On the trial, the court sustained the motion, by quashing the execution and setting aside the sale.
The record presents this state of facts. The plaintiff below bad recovered a judgment in the circuit court of Jackson county against the defendant; in entering the verdict and judgment, ,the word “ dollars ” was omitted. The entry is this :• “ We, the jury,,…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Hopper v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Flack v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- In re BoydDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1877
- Patrick v. CarrMississippi Supreme Court · 1874
- Snow v. WestUtah Supreme Court · 1910