Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Sanofi S.A.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided November 25, 2024No. 8:23-cv-02472Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION BARBARA L. CUNNINGHAM and DAVID CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 8:23-cv-02472-TPB-AEP SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, ET AL., Defendants. / REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This cause comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs Barbara and David Cunningham’s Motion for Review of Clerk’s Action on Bill of Costs. (Doc. 54). Defendants Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, et al., have filed a response in opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion. (Doc. 57). Based on the foregoing, it is recommended that Plaintiffs’ motion be denied. I. Background Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Willie Mathews v. James McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Morrison v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  5. John F. Loughan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, John F. Loughan, Cross-Appellee v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API