Hoskins v. Rowe
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Cedar District Court. This action, was originally commenced against tbe defendants to quiet tbe title of tbe plaintiff to forty acres of land. Tbe defendant answered, denying that tbe plaintiff bad any interest in tbe land.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Cedar District Court. This action, was originally commenced against tbe defendants to quiet tbe title of tbe plaintiff to forty acres of land. Tbe defendant answered, denying that tbe plaintiff bad any interest in tbe land. Mary S. Parr intervened in tbe action, and claimed tliat tbe plaintiff beld the legal title of tbe land in trust for herself and other heirs of F. M. Denny, deceased, and she asserted a specific lien of $500 upon the land, and prayed for general relief. Tbe plaintiff answered this petition of intervention by denying any trust whatever, and asserting that be was…
1Opinion of the CourtEothrock, J.
No appeal was taken by tbe defendants. The questions to be determined relate solely to tlie controversy between plaintiff and tbe intervenor. We will proceed to state tbe facts which are conceded, or which, in onr opinion, are fully established by the evidence, without reviewing the testimony of the witnesses.
i. vendor’s kyone'oisevagSns^ap’or,iaiídOÍ tlie ■ William Denny died in 1877, leaving his property, which consisted of two hundred and forty acres of land, to his' widow, F. M. Denny. In 1878, F. M. Denny conveyed one forty-acre tract of the land to the intervenor, Mary S. Parr, who is a…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Reiger v. TurleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Boatwright v. American Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- McAnulty v. PeisenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Hogueland v. ArtsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Johnston v. MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.