Legal Opinion

Filk v. Beatty

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 20, 1989No. 89-35PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

In 1984, Elizabeth F. Beatty executed a durable power of attorney pursuant to the provisions of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 58-501 etseq. (Repl. 1971) (Ark. Code Ann. § 28-68-301 et seq. (1987)) and Ark. Stat. Ann. § 58-701 et seq. (Supp. 1985) (Ark. Code Ann. § 28-68-201 etseq. (1987)) for the purpose for having her son, Lloyd David Beatty, appointed to provide for her needs in the event she became incompetent. The power of attorney was presented to the probate judge pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 58-501 (Repl. 1971) (Ark. Code Ann. § 28-68-304 (1987)) and was signed by him…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. McElroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  2. McDonald v. Fort Smith & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Sullivan v. Times Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of Puddy v. GillamCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Phillips v. Commonwealth Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Prickett v. Hot Spring County Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API