Pruitt v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The defendant was indicted in two counts. The first charged manufacturing whisky and the second the unlawful possession of a still, etc. The conviction under the first count was an acquittal under the second, ánd therefore' rulings of the court which relate solely to the charge under the second count need’ not be considered. However, we may add that the rulings of the court in' this regard were free • from error. Scott v. State, 20 Ala. App. 360, 102 So. 152; Reeves v. State, 19 Ala. App. 72, 95 So. 203; Wilson v. State, 20 Ala. App. 62, 100 So. 914.
What was said by the parties relative to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Reeves v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Scott v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sherman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
- Hall v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
- Clark v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953