Legal Opinion

Martin v. Dayton School District No. 2

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1975No. 43152PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

Defendant school district issued to plaintiff school teacher a notice of discharge which was legally defective for reasons mentioned later. The district, on the same day that the plaintiff appealed that notice to the superior court, issued a second, legally adequate notice which plaintiff also appealed. The trial court upheld plaintiff’s discharge. The Court of Appeals reversed and ordered plaintiff reinstated. Martin Dayton School Dist. 2, 10 Wn. App. 191, 517 P.2d 216 (1973). We reverse the Court of Appeals and affirm the trial court.

The sole issue is whether a legally defective notice of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Lake Stevens School District No. 4Washington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Fischback & Moore of Alaska, Inc. v. LynnAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Martin v. Dayton School District No. 2Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Vancouver School District No. 37Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  2. Benavides v. Civil Service Commission of SelahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  3. Stieler v. Spokane School District No. 81Washington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Van Horn v. Highline School District No. 401Court of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. Westside Charter Service, Inc. v. Gray Line ToursNevada Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API