Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 17, 1977No. 54793PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The only enumeration of error in this case is that, after the defendant’s counsel invoked the rule of sequestration of. witnesses, the nominal prosecutor was excepted from the rule. Under the decision in James v. State, 143 Ga. App. 696, following Jarrell v. State, 234 Ga. 410, 420 (216 SE2d 258) and other cases, where the trial court exercises his discretion in allowing a police officer who is the nominal prosecutor to remain in the courtroom based on the district attorney’s statement that he cannot fairly and adequately represent the state without such officer’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jarrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API