Legal Opinion

College Heights Credit Union v. Boyd

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1991No. 9012DC1334PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

We note at the outset that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear this action and vacate the judgment of the' trial court. We therefore confine our discussion of the case to this narrow issue and do not reach defendants’ assignments of error asserting their entitlement to a new trial.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 42-26 governs actions in summary ejectment. This statute states:

Any tenant or lessee of any house or land, and the assigns under the tenant or legal representatives of such tenant or lessee, who holds over and continues in the possession of the demised premises,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hauser v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Howell v. . BransonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Jones v. SwainCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adams v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. LouEveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  3. LouEveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. LouEveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API