Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Blakney

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1978No. 584PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

The conviction of the defendant for the crime of possession of a controlled substance was based on evidence obtained incident to an arrest on an arrest warrant issued for an unrelated charge which lacked probable cause. Hence, it must be reversed.

It was tried before the court without a jury. There is no substantial dispute as to the facts. The defendant had borrowed a shot gun from John Ray which he failed to return. Defendant told Ray that his apartment had been burglarized and the gun taken. When Ray sought to gain admission to the defendant’s home on several occasions, he was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Commonwealth v. KenneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Commonwealth v. GalloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. SpriggsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Com. v. Heidelberg, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. Commonwealth v. MintonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Com. v. Heidelberg, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Com. v. Gibbs, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Com. v. Steadly, Q.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API