Legal Opinion
Aldridge Currie v. Neil McDowell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 8, 2016No. 13-16187PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
This is the latest case arising out of a jury selected by David Brown, a prosecutor with a history of unconstitutional race-based peremptory strikes. We previously held that Brown violated the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause when he struck three African-American women from the jury of petitioner Aldridge Currie’s first trial. See Currie v. Adams, 149 Fed.Appx. 615 (9th Cir. 2005). At the retrial resulting from that opinion, the trial judge found that Brown had violated Batson again by striking three African-American prospective jurors.
This case arises out…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Hunter v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Robert Murray v. Dora SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Tolbert v. PageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- William Lee Shackleford v. Susan Hubbard, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. MikhelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Washington v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Anthony Oliver v. Ronald DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Maureen McDermott v. Deborah JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Tomas Rodriguez Infante v. Michael MartelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.