Legal Opinion
United States v. Crews
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 10, 2007No. 06-30414, 06-30589PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Senior District Judge:
Most of the arguments raised in these two cases arise from the execution of one search warrant at 6731 SE 82nd Avenue, Apartment 3 (“Apartment 3”) in Portland, Oregon. As residents of Apartment 3, Uhuru Navanda Crews and Ebonique Ma-nus .(“Crews” and “Manus,” or collectively “Defendants”) continue to attack the validity of the underlying affidavit upon which the search warrant was based. Defendants argued below, and continue to argue, that the affidavit is so lacking in indicia of probable cause that no police officer could have reasonably relied upon it in good…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Edward TerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Fayelynn Sams v. Yahoo! Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. SDI Future Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Lei ShiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. John UnderwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.