Legal Opinion

Employment Department v. Bires

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 26, 1997No. 94-AB-2381, 96-AB-97, 94-AB-2438, 96-AB-95; CA A86537, A91620, A86643, A91619Published

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Petitioners1 seek review of final orders of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) holding that claimants Ella Bires and Lorraine Goodman were not disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits during the summer recess of 1994. We address only whether EAB erred in holding that, even in cases involving periods between academic years, EAB is required to make a “threshold inquiry” to determine whether claimants were unemployed immediately before the summer recess. We reverse and remand.

The construction and application of the relevant statute, ORS 657.167, is a question of law.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Slominski v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Kautz v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Salem-Keizer School District 24J v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Employment Division v. CurrinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Hutchinson v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API