Atkins v. Davison
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A. HOWARD MATZ, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, all the records and files herein, and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections to the Report and Rec ommendation have been filed herein. Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection has been made, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions and…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Halbesleben v. AkamatsuDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2020