Legal Opinion · Dissent

Guillen v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 21, 2012No. 3D11-3321Published

1DissentSalter, J.

I respectfully dissent. The Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission’s order approved procedural and legal errors by the Agency for Workforce Innovation, since renamed the Department for Economic Opportunity, in this unemployment benefits case, with the result that the order should be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings before the Department.

I. Facts and Procedural Background

The employee, claimant, and appellant here, Mr. Guillen, began working for Republic Services of Florida as a recycling truck driver in October 2008. As his supervisor explained at the telephonic…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Webb v. RiceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Crosby v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Wilson v. FLA. UNEMP. APPEALS COMM.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Reeves v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. Curras v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API