Superior Glass Co. v. First Bristol County National Bank
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBraucher, J.
The plaintiffs are two unpaid subcontractors on a construction project. They recovered judgments against the owner on a theory of unjust enrichment, and the Appeals Court affirmed the judgments, holding that the owner had a “fiduciary duty” derived “from the peculiar combination of circumstances in this case.” Superior Glass Co. v. First Bristol County Nat’l Bank, 8 Mass. App. Ct. 356, 362 (1979). We granted the owner’s application for further appellate review. We disapprove the “fiduciary” label, but we affirm the judgments on the basis of unjust enrichment.
We summarize the judge’s findings.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Choate, Hall & Stewart v. SCA Services, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Broomfield v. KosowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Barry v. CovichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Johnson-Foster Co. v. D'Amore Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- FAMM Steel, Inc. v. Sovereign BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Industrial General Corp. v. Sequoia Pacific Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Nessralla v. PeckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Fernandes v. HavkinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Islam v. Option One Mortgage Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.