Legal Opinion

Robb v. Gylock Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1956No. Appeal, No. 309PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Arnold,

In this action of trespass defendant appeals from the refusal of its motion for judgment n.o.v., based'on plaintiff’s contributory negligence, and of its motion for new trial, founded on the claim that its negligence .was not established and that the verdict was excessive.

The verdict of the jury established the following facts:

Plaintiff was a truck driver for the Pioneer Salt Company. As such, he delivered to defendant carboys containing sulphuric acid, and also collected them, when empty, for return to his employer. Defendant was one to which such material and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RulonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Heyse v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dyson v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Lebeck v. William A. Jarvis, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Eckborg v. Hyde-Murphy Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Eckman v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Smith v. LinnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API