Rosen v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1DissentCassibry, District Judge
(dissenting):*
“ * * * One of the basic values of [the right to] privacy is birth control, as evidenced by the Griswold decision. Griswold’s act was to prevent forma*1233tion of the fetus. This, the court found, was constitutionally protected. If an individual may prevent conception, why can he not nullify that conception when prevention has failed?” Mr. Justice Clark, Religion, Morality, and Abortion: A Constitutional Appraisal, 2 Loyola Law Review of L. A. 1, 8 (1969)
Because, answer the majority of this Court, a “human life” comes into existence at conception, and the State’s interest in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.