Legal Opinion

James G. Wallace v. Tri-State Motor Transit Co., Etc., Tri-State Motor Transit Company

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 11, 1984No. 83-7411PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODBOLD, Chief Judge:

In this case we consider Alabama’s “no duty” rule applicable to tort actions between landowner and invitee. We reverse the judgment for plaintiff and hold that under Alabama law the defendant landowner owed no duty to the plaintiff and that defendant’s motions for directed verdict and judgment n.o.v. should have been granted.

Allstate Security Systems contracted with defendant Tri-State to provide security at one of Tri-State’s closed Birmingham terminals from 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Wallace was employed by Allstate as security guard on those premises, which were used as a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Quillen v. QuillenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Lamson & Sessions Bolt Co. v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Alabama Power Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Kingsberry Homes Corporation v. RalstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  5. Standifer v. PateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moore v. Schering Plough, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  2. Pickett v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Watkins v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1992
  4. Harrell v. Walmart IncDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2024
  5. Kornegay v. High Point Birmingham LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API