Legal Opinion

Martin v. Roeder

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1996No. 96-399PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The court of appeals correctly concluded that Civ.R. 60(B) is clearly inapplicable to review the court’s judgment on appeal. Civ.R. 1(C)(1). The Rules of Appellate Procedure govern appeals from trial courts of record to courts of appeals in Ohio. App.R. 1(A); Pegan v. Crawmer (1996), 73 Ohio St.3d 607, 608, 653 N.E.2d 659, 660; see, generally, McCormac, Ohio Civil Rules Practice (2 Ed.1992) 5, Section 1.05 (Civil Rules have no application to procedure in courts of appeals to review any judgment, order, or ruling, since the Appellate Rules set forth the applicable procedure).

In addition, under…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pegan v. CrawmerOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. KnoxOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Schwind v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Lane v. U.S. Bank N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Rutushin v. ArditiOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Martin v. RoederOhio Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API