Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bazemore v. Davis

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1978No. 12093Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGallagher, Associate Judge

There is perhaps no issue more important or more perplexing to come before the trial court than deciding on the custody of children of tender years. What standards to apply in awarding custody of a young child is a problem which has troubled judges at least since the time of King Solomon. In what has been termed in legal quarters as the leading case in this jurisdiction on child custody, this court said:

Out of a maze of conflicting testimony, usually including what one court called “a tolerable amount of perjury,” the judge must make a decision which will inevitably affect materially the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Boone v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. Coles v. ColesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. In re N. M. S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Rzeszotarski v. RzeszotarskiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API