Legal Opinion

Close v. Witbeck

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiffs to require the defendant to remove a certain structure on the south side of State street in the city of Schenectady, so far as it is an obstruction to the said street, to restrain the defendant from reconstructing the same so that it will be an obstruction to the street, and to recover the special damages suffered by the plaintiffs because of such obstruction.

The plaintiffs are the owners in fee simple of lands known as Nos. 422 and 424 State street in the city of Schenectady, being a lot about twenty-seven feet wide along *225the street and one hundred…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. . TrueNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Wakeman v. . WilburNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Sautter v. Utica City National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. Florida Chautauqua Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API