Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Seattle v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1985No. 50629-9Published

1DissentDolliver, J.

(dissenting) — No great mystery underlies *679this case. The City of Seattle is anxious to annex certain property which includes the main plant of the Boeing Company. An affidavit on behalf of the defendants indicates the City will reap $2 to $3 million more annually in revenue over services provided to the area proposed to be annexed. Having failed in attempting to persuade the Legislature of the unfairness of the statutory requirements for annexation, the City has changed its venue and now calls upon the courts to hold the legislation unconstitutional.

In its recital of facts, the majority…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. Washington Life & Disability Insurance Guaranty Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Save a Valuable Environment v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Omar Stratman v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API