Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Orr

I fully concur in the reasoning and the result of the main opinion. I write specially to add that the standard of review applicable to this case further bolsters the result reached in the main opinion.

As the main opinion correctly states, this court may reverse a pure finding of fact only if that finding of fact is not supported by substantial evidence. 29 So.3d at 214 (citing Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-81(e)(2)). In Ex parte McInish, [Ms. 1060600, Sept. 5, 2008] — So.3d - (Ala.2008), the supreme court explained the meaning of “substantial evidence” in relation to an appellate court’s review of…