Legal Opinion
Carvalho v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 30, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an application pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) for leave to file a late claim, the State of New York appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Blinder, J.), dated December 28, 1989, which, upon renewal, granted the application.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) permits the late filing of a claim, in the court’s discretion, upon consideration of certain enumerated factors. No one factor is considered to be determinative (see, Bay Terrace Coop. Section IV v New York State Employees’ Retirement Sys. Policemen’s & Firemen’s Retirement…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bay Terrace Cooperative Section IV, Inc. v. New York State Employees' Retirement System Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- DeFilippis v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Dillon v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Thompson v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- Qing Liu v. City UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Holly v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Soble v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Casey v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Unigard Insurance Group v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.