Hercules Mining Co. v. United States
District Court, D. Idaho
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAH, District Judge.-
The action presents the same principle of law that appeared in the cases of United Mercury Mines Co. v. Viley, Collector of Internal Revenue, D.C., 20 F. Supp. 734, and Ambergris Consolidated Mining Company v. United States, D.C., 27 F.Supp. 968, where the Court was called upon to interpret the revenue Act known as the Capital Stock Tax Act, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 1200 et seq., and it was there held that the activities engaged in by the Company depended upon its particular facts and must relate to the carrying on in a corporate capacity as authorized. This…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Von Baumbach v. Sargent Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. Emery, Bird, Thayer Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- McCoach v. Minehill & Schuylkill Haven RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Lewellyn v. Pittsburgh, B. & L. E. R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- General Ribbon Mills, Inc. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940