Matter of Hunt
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
The single issue raised by respondents’ counsel in these cases concerns whether the trial court’s granting the State or ordering a continuance for the sole purpose of allowing the State time to present additional evidence against the respondents constituted placing them in double jeopardy in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment has been made applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784, 23 L.Ed. 2d 707, 89 S.Ct. 2056 (1969). The Double Jeopardy…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- David Montgomery Webb v. Terrell Don HuttoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- State v. CooleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. BarronMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BrunsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.