Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Allen

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided April 26, 2022No. 3:14-cv-00741Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DANIEL CARPENTER, and GRIST MILL CAPITAL, LLC, No. 3:14-cv-741 (SRU) Plaintiffs, v. LYNN ALLEN, et al., Defendants. RULING ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION On March 15, 2022, I decided a long-running dispute between plaintiffs Daniel Carpenter (“Carpenter”) and Grist Mill Capital, LLC (“GMC,” collectively “Plaintiffs”) and the Department of Labor (“DOL”) over several bankers boxes of documents the government originally seized in a 2010 search of Plaintiffs’ business premises. In short, I granted Plaintiffs’ Rule 41(g) motion and ordered the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Analytical Surveys, Inc. v. Tonga Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  3. Schoolcraft v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  4. Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API