Legal Opinion

Banschbach v. Gillen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 3, 1909No. Gen. No. 14,415PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Gemmill, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff in error sued the defendant in error for a balance, which he claimed to be due to him for commissions on sales of thé Burroughs Adding Machines, attachments and immediate accessories. No question is raised in regard to the pleadings. The cause was tried by the court and a jury. The jury found the issues for the plaintiff and assessed his damages at the sum of $41.31, and the court, after overruling plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, rendered judgment on the verdict. Alter judgment the plaintiff moved to set aside the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hawkyard v. SuttleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API