Legal Opinion

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. J.C. Penney Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1988No. 86-1139PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) charges J.C. Penney Company (“Penney”) with sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. The EEOC challenges the “head of household” provision of Penney’s medical and dental insurance plan, which permits a Penney employee to elect coverage for his or her spouse only if the spouse earns less than the employee. The district court granted partial summary judgment to Penney, 632 F.Supp. 871, holding that the “head of household” requirement could be challenged only…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Connecticut v. TealSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. County of Washington v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Cora Aldrich v. Randolph Central School District and Cattaraugus County Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. Dorothy Kovacevich v. Kent State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. Belfi v. PrendergastCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. Shannon Balmer v. Hca, Inc. Health Care Indemnity, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. Laura Beck-Wilson v. Anthony Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API