Legal Opinion

Inez Utzinger, Now Inez Hillis, as Admrx., Etc. And in Her Own Behalf, Libellant-Appellant v. United States v. Inez Utzinger, Now Inez Hillis, Admrx., Etc., Cross-Respondent-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 30, 1970No. 19613_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

432 F.2d 485

Inez UTZINGER, now Inez Hillis, as Admrx., etc. and in her

own behalf, Libellant-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee, v. Inez

UTZINGER, now Inez Hillis, Admrx., etc.,

Cross-Respondent-Appellee.

No. 19613.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 30, 1970.

Walter C. Beall, Cincinnati, Ohio, for libelant-appellant; Hoover, Beall & Eichel, Cincinnati, Ohio, Harry Alan Sherman, Pittsburgh, Pa., on brief.

Walter H. Fleischer, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent-appellee; William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Morton Hollander, Atty.,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API