Legal Opinion

Bruner v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1928No. 13,039PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Action by appellant against appellee, as initial carrier, under the Carmack Amendment to the Act to Regulate Commerce, for alleged damage to livestock sustained in transit while in the possession of a connecting carrier.

There was a special finding of facts and conclusions of law stated thereon by the court. The conclusions of law stated on the issues involved on the first paragraph of complaint were against appellee, and, on the second and third paragraphs, the conclusions were against appellant.

Judgment was rendered against appellee on the first paragraph of complaint for $53.56, and, on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Butler v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PartlowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Merchant Shippers Ass'n v. Kellogg Express & Draying Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Automated Donut Systems, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  3. Atlanta, Birmingham & Coast R. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API