Legal Opinion
People v. Sanchez
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 5, 1994No. A059737PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1682Opinion
BENSON, J.*
Eli azar Sanchez appeals after a jury convicted him of two counts of robbery. He asserts the case must be remanded for resentencing because the trial court failed to state reasons for imposing consecutive, rather than concurrent, sentences. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
Jatindergit Singh testified that on February 15, 1992, he was working at a Quik Stop Store on Lei and Road in Pittsburg. He stated that two men—one African-American, one Latino—came into the store and took beer from the cooler. When Singh asked for money, the African-American man displayed a gun and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- People v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. SandovalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. VaccaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- P. v. Booker CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.