Legal Opinion
United States v. Gilbert Espinoza-Seanez, Ernesto Espinoza-Seanez and Raul Lazarin-Becerra
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 1, 1989No. 88-1026PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:
The appellants, Gilbert Espinoza-Seanez, Ernesto Espinoza-Seanez and Raul Laza-rin-Becerra (hereafter Gilbert, Ernesto, and Lazarin, respectively) were found guilty of conspiracy to possess marihuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846(1). Gilbert was also found guilty of the substantive offense of possession. Gilbert received concurrent sentences of five years for each count, a three-year term of supervised release for the offense of possession, and $100 in assessments pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3013(a); Ernesto and Lazarin…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- United States v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Rita Ann Cardenas and Shamsideen Abiodun LawalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Posada-RiosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- U.S. v. MergersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Brad Eugene Branch, Kevin Whitecliff, Jaime Castillo, Renos Lenny Avraam, Paul Fatta and Graeme Leonard CraddockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.