Legal Opinion

Hart v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 14, 1849PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the Fayette Circuit. Caveats. ■Rivers. Vacant lands. Caveat. Case 94.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Maesiiall

Hart having obtained a warrant from the proper officer of Madison county, under the acts of 1835 and' 1837, “to appropriate the vacant lands north and east of the Tennessee river, to the counties in which they lie,” caused it to be surveyed so as to cover a portion of the bed of the Kentucky river to low water mark on each side, in or between the counties of Fayette and Madison. Rogers afterwards, under a warrant regularly obtained in the county of Fayette, caused a survey tó be made covering the same land, and filed a caveat to prevent .the issuing of a patent on the survey of HarL The…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bringardner Lumber Co. v. BinghamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
  2. Helton v. DayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1956
  3. McClendon v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API