Legal Opinion

Brittany A. Karels v. Gabriel A. Storz

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 15, 2018No. 17-2527PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Brittany Karels brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Gabriel Storz and Samuel Norlin, in their individual capacities as officers of the Big Lake, Minnesota, Police Department. Karels alleged, inter alia , that the officers used excessive force in effectuating her arrest in violation of her Fourth Amendment rights. After the officers moved for summary judgment, Karels withdrew her claim against Norlin. As relevant here, the district court 1 determined that Storz was not entitled to qualified immunity on the excessive force claim and denied summary judgment as…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Mullenix v. LunaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Timothy Johnson v. Michael RogersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Courtney MacKintrush v. Dustin HodgeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  3. Juan Shelton v. Brian StevensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  4. Michael McReynolds v. Darrell SchmidliCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  5. Deezia v. City of LincolnDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API