Blackman v. Buck Construction Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceWiest, J.
I concur in the result. The record is somewhat unsatisfactory, but, I think, fairly discloses that the claim of res adjudicata was presented at the hearing before the commission. The point was discussed in the opinion by the commission and held to be of no avail, because of a material change in plaintiff’s condition, traceable to the injury and resulting in the loss of his leg. There was medical testimony sustaining this finding by the commission.
The former finding was an adjudication of plaintiff’s claim for compensation as of that date. While it is true that the commission may neither grant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Levanen v. Seneca Copper CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Harris v. Castile Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Burley v. Central Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Anderson v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Miller v. KeeneMichigan Supreme Court · 1925