Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided November 25, 2003No. Nos. 5267-01 and 5268-01Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

RICKY SCHMIDT AND SUZETTA J. SCHMIDT, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent HILLSIDE DAIRY, INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Schmidt v. Comm'r

Nos. 5267-01 and 5268-01

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2003-325; 2003 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 326; 86 T.C.M. (CCH) 631;

November 25, 2003, Filed

Petitioners held liable for the accuracy-related penalty for the years at issue.

Douglas Bleeker, for petitioners.

Douglas Polsky and Charles Berlau, for respondent.

Jacobs, Julian I.

JACOBS

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

JACOBS, Judge: These cases have been…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Commissioner v. HeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. North American Oil Consolidated v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Vanicek v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  5. United States v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API