Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Braun

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1981No. 78-082-CRPublished

1DissentShirley S. Abrahamson, J.

Interpreting ch. 969 and ch. 973, Stats., as articulating a legislative interest in the immediate incarceration of the defendant after sentencing and denominating that interest as public policy, the majority holds that a bail bond agreement extending bond beyond sentencing is void as a matter of public policy and that the surety’s duty to produce the defendant pursuant to a bail bond agreement expires, again as a matter of public policy, at the time of sentencing. The result is that while the convicted and sentenced defendant remains at large, a fugitive from justice, the surety recovers…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Vic Hansen & Sons, Inc. v. CrowleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. In re WebbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State v. CaffeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API