Legal Opinion

Fidelity-Baltimore National Bank v. United States

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 6, 1963No. Civ. No. 11498PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTER, District Judge.

As an incident to the corporate marriage of Baltimore National Bank, a national banking association (hereafter called “Baltimore”), and The Fidelity Trust Company, a Maryland chartered state bank (hereafter called “Fidelity”), the Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined that the resulting Fidelity-Baltimore National Bank & Trust Company (hereafter called “Fidelity-Baltimore”), was liable for original issue and documentary stamp tax for shares of Fidelity-Baltimore issued to shareholders of Baltimore and Fidelity. Fidelity-Baltimore paid the taxes, filed timely…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Keokuk & Western Railroad v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Ex Parte Worcester County National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. United States v. Seattle-First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. Merchants Nat. Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Barlow Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Morris Trust v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  3. Morris Trust v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API