Legal Opinion

Fornataro v. Atlantic Coast Building & Loan Ass'n

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 28, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sooy, C. C. J.

These cases are before me on motions to strike the complaints on the ground that they do not set forth a cause of action under chapter 102. Pamph. L. 1932.

The facts set forth in the complaints are that (a) defendant is a building and loan association under the laws of New Jersey; (b) that on December 31.st, 1925, plaintiff Bomano became a member and that on June 7th, 1923, plaintiff Fornataro became a member; (c) that thereafter both plaintiffs made various deposits as such members; (d) that thereafter defendant association credited declared dividends in favor of plaintiffs; (e)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Engelhardt v. Fifth Ward Permanent Dime Saving & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Heinbokel v. National Savings, Loan & Bldg. Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. Eastern Building & Loan Ass'n v. SnyderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  5. Fitzgerald v. State Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Treigle v. Acme Homestead Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  2. Williams v. WilliamsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  3. Home Bldg. Savings Association v. ClaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  4. Moore v. ConoverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1937
  5. Independence Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SellarsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API