Fornataro v. Atlantic Coast Building & Loan Ass'n
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Sooy, C. C. J.
These cases are before me on motions to strike the complaints on the ground that they do not set forth a cause of action under chapter 102. Pamph. L. 1932.
The facts set forth in the complaints are that (a) defendant is a building and loan association under the laws of New Jersey; (b) that on December 31.st, 1925, plaintiff Bomano became a member and that on June 7th, 1923, plaintiff Fornataro became a member; (c) that thereafter both plaintiffs made various deposits as such members; (d) that thereafter defendant association credited declared dividends in favor of plaintiffs; (e)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Engelhardt v. Fifth Ward Permanent Dime Saving & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Heinbokel v. National Savings, Loan & Bldg. Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Eastern Building & Loan Ass'n v. SnyderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
- Fitzgerald v. State Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Treigle v. Acme Homestead Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Williams v. WilliamsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Home Bldg. Savings Association v. ClaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Moore v. ConoverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1937
- Independence Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SellarsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.